Reflection_Tuning
[ACL'24] Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuning
Stars: 124
Reflection-Tuning is a project focused on improving the quality of instruction-tuning data through a reflection-based method. It introduces Selective Reflection-Tuning, where the student model can decide whether to accept the improvements made by the teacher model. The project aims to generate high-quality instruction-response pairs by defining specific criteria for the oracle model to follow and respond to. It also evaluates the efficacy and relevance of instruction-response pairs using the r-IFD metric. The project provides code for reflection and selection processes, along with data and model weights for both V1 and V2 methods.
README:
[Method V1] Reflection-Tuning: Data Recycling Improves LLM Instruction-Tuning (NIPS'23 Wrokshop)
[Method V2] Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for LLM Instruction-Tuning (ACL'24)
Chinese Version: [知乎]
This is the repo for the Reflection-Tuning project, which introduces a reflection-based method to improve the quality of instruction-tuning data.
The repo contains:
Data: (The detailed description will be found in Section Data and Model Weights V2 )
Recycled Data (V1): Alpaca, WizardLM70k
Selective Recycled Data (V2): Alpaca, WizardLM70k
Overall Reflected Data: Alpaca, WizardLM70k, WizardLM V2
Overall Reflected Data IFD scores:Alpaca llama2 7b, Alpaca llama2 13b, WizardLM70k llama2 7b, WizardLM70k llama2 13b
(Feel free to email Ming (Homepage, Email) for any questions or feedback.)
- [2024/05] Our Selective Reflection-Tuning has been accepted to the ACL 2024 findings!
- [2024/02] We release the paper of our Selective Reflection-Tuning.
- [2023/12] We add the complete data of Selective Instruction-Tuning (V2 method) and add the evaluation results.
- [2023/12] We add the description of Selective Instruction-Tuning (V2 method).
- [2023/10] The Reflection-Tuning has been accepted by the NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Instruction Tuning and Instruction Following.
- [2023/10] We released the V2 model and pushed models to the Alpaca Eval leaderboard.
- [2023/10] We released codes for this project.
- Overview
- Highlights
- Selective Reflection-Tuning
- Install
- Code for Reflection
- Code for Selection
- Data and Model Weights V1
- Data and Model Weights V2
- Prompt and Hyperparameters
- ToDo
- Citation
- Our Related Works
We propose a reflection-based method for improving the quality of instruction-response pairs. Given the initial base dataset, we are motivated to generate a high-quality version of each data point with an oracle model, chatGPT for instance. However, a common problem with using LLMs as judges is the failure to obtain diverse results. To overcome this potential problem, inspired by Chain-of-Thought prompting, we further define several specific criteria for the oracle model to follow, and respond to those specific criteria with critical responses, respectively. Then the responses to these criteria can serve as bridges (chain of thought) to generate new instruction-response pairs that are satisfied.
In the original Reflection-Tuning, we propose a data improvement method through Reflection.
However, two research questions arise:
- Is the teacher-refined data compatible with the needs of the student model?
- How does the student model decide which enhanced data are most needed and critical to its training?
To answer the above questions, we propose Selective Reflection-Tuning, in which the student model can decide whether to accept the improvement of the teacher model.
- In Reflection-Tuning V1, we propose a reflection method that can improve the quality of the instruction-tuning dataset, which is a general method and can be utilized on almost ANY instruction-tuning dataset.
- We implement our method on both Alpaca and WizardLM datasets and release the newly-generated high-quality recycled datasets.
- We propose an interactive selection pipeline where the oracle model and student model cooperate to build a more coherent and model-compatible instruction-following dataset, which can be further adapted into other self-improvement scenarios.
- Our selectively recycled data has a supreme quality, with only instruction tuning on a few thousand of automatically generated data, our models achieve promising performances compared to models with dozens of thousands of data.
- We present a nuanced evaluation schema r-IFD that quantifies the efficacy and relevance of instruction-response pairs.
Existing methods of data enhancement usually do not take a critical criterion into account: Is the teacher-refined data compatible with the needs of the student model? These approaches typically do not account for the inherent randomness and potential degradation associated with the generative models' output, leading to an oversight in how the student model responds to these "improved" data samples. Consequently, a mechanism for the student model to selectively integrate these enhancements has been notably absent. To bridge this gap, our work introduces an interactive pipeline wherein an oracle generative model engages in a reflection process to enhance both the instruction and response of a data sample. The student model then evaluates whether to incorporate these improvements based on its unique attributes. This pipeline is versatile and can be adapted to various contexts where data enhancement is needed.
Then, another pivotal question arises: How does the student model decide which enhanced data are most needed and critical to its training? This question underpins the challenge of autonomously evaluating the quality of instructions and responses. Common practices involve utilizing sophisticated models like GPT-4 for assessment purposes or employing a secondary judge model equipped with evaluative capabilities. These methods, however, present limitations: they fail to address the discrepancies between the evaluating model and the actual student model undergoing training. Particularly in the latter approach, even though the judge model and the student model share the same structural framework, their weight distributions diverge once endowed with basic evaluative functions. Consequently, the preferences of the judge model may not align with the real student model's requirements. To circumvent these issues, we adopt a statistical method, utilizing the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) score proposed by Cherry LLM. This score is derived directly from the raw student model, thereby mitigating potential domain shifts and ensuring that the evaluation is better aligned with the student model’s learning context. We further introduce a reversed version of IFD named reversed-IFD (r-IFD). This metric evaluates how much the response contributes to predicting the corresponding instruction.
We utilize the IFD score to select reflected instructions and utilize the r-IFD score to select reflected responses.
Below is the performance for pair-wise comparison between our model and other classic models on the WizardLM test set. We follow the implementation from AlpaGasus and Cherry LLM, which greatly eliminates the potential position bias of GPT4. The prompts can be found in our paper, and the data, code, and use cases for evaluation can be found in Cherry LLM Repo.
Below are the performance results on the Alapca Eval leaderboard. “Data” represents the number of data used for fine-tuning. “RLHF/AIF” represents whether the model utilizes an additional RLHF or RLAIF process.
Below are comparisons between model performances and data used for fine-tuning on the Alapca Eval benchmark and the open LLM leaderboard. We utilize star markers to represent our models, dot markers to represent other instruction-tuned models and triangle markers to represent RLHF/AIF models. Blue markers represent 7B models, red markers represent 13B models and purple markers represent models with larger weights.
It is astonishing that with less than 1k automatically generated instruction samples (2%, 926 samples), our model achieves really promising performance (74.29 win rate on alpaca eval rate, 57.80 averaged score on Open LLM Leaderboard), showing the supreme quality of our sRecycled data.
Install the dependencies with pip install -r requirements.txt
Reflecting on the whole dataset containing dozens of thousands of data will consume a lot, so we recommend using some tiny datasets for the beginning, for example, cherry data from Cherry LLM. Experiments show that simply reflecting on a subset of high-quality data can also get a promising performance.
In the below scripts, we directly run on data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json which contains only approximately 3k Alpaca data.
- Reflection
python reflection_code/reflecn_instruction.py \
--data_path data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json \
--save_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_ins_raw.json \
--api_key xxx
--data_path: The targeted dataset in the Alpaca format
--save_path: The path to save the raw reflection texts
--api_key: Your openAI key
- Extract the instruction-response pairs:
python reflection_code/reflect_instruction_postprocess.py \
--raw_data_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_ins_raw.json \
--ori_data_path data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json \
--save_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_ins.json \
--save_intermediate_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_ins_mid.json \
--api_key xxx
--raw_data_path: The path that saves the raw reflection texts
--ori_data_path: The original targeted dataset in the Alpaca format
--save_path: The path to save formated dataset in the Alpaca format
--save_intermediate_path: The path to save the middle results
--api_key: Your openAI key
- Reflection
python reflection_code/reflect_response.py \
--data_path data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json \
--save_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_res_raw.json \
--api_key xxx
- Extract the instruction-response pairs:
python reflection_code/reflect_response_postprocess.py \
--raw_data_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_res_raw.json \
--ori_data_path data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json \
--save_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_res.json \
--save_intermediate_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_reflect_res_mid.json \
--api_key xxx
Note: When reflecting on the instruction, we first compress the instruction and input it into one single instruction for easier processing by using chatGPT.
The whole compressed Alpaca data can be found in the data folder.
Note: The extraction of reflection results is based on regular expression and, thus is not perfect. We will release the raw output before the extraction in the future.
- Generate Data Statistics
python selection_code/data_analysis.py \
--data_path data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json \
--save_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_analysis.jsonl \
--model_name_or_path meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf
This code calculates the necessary statistics for calculating IFD scores and r-IFD scores.
Please feel free to customize your own training prompt and model.
- Put the Statistics to Original Data
python selection_code/put_analysis_to_data.py \
--pt_data_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_analysis.jsonl \
--json_data_path data/cherry_alpaca_v1/cherry_alpaca_5_percent_compressed.json \
--json_save_path cherry_alpaca_5_percent_with_analysis.json
After obtaining data with IFD scores and r-IFD scores, you can compare these scores to make the customized selection.
The following table provides a comparison between our recycled models (V1) and baseline models on the AlpacaEval Leaderboard and Huggingface Open LLM Leaderboard.
The Recycled Alpaca Data can be found here: [hf-Link]
The Recycled WizardLM (70k) Data can be found here: [hf-Link]
| AlpacaEval | Avg | ARC | HellaSwag | MMLU | TruthfulQA | Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpaca 7B | 26.46 | 50.21 | 42.65 | 76.91 | 41.73 | 39.55 | / | ||
| Recycled Alpaca 7B V1.0 | 76.99 | 56.18 | 53.92 | 77.68 | 47.55 | 45.55 | [hf-Link] | ||
| Recycled Alpaca 13B V1.0 | 83.42 | 58.93 | 58.70 | 80.80 | 53.11 | 43.12 | [Link] | ||
| WizardLM 7B | 67.64 | 54.18 | 51.60 | 77.70 | 42.70 | 44.70 | / | ||
| Recycled WizardLM 7B V1.0 | 78.88 | 56.21 | 53.92 | 77.05 | 48.35 | 45.52 | [hf-Link] | ||
In the repo, we name our Selective Reflection-Tuning as the V2 method for simplicity.
The following table provides a comparison between our sRecycled models (V2) and baseline models on the AlpacaEval Leaderboard and Huggingface Open LLM Leaderboard.
The data used for training llama2-7b model can be directly found here:
Selective Recycled Data (V2): Alpaca, WizardLM70k
The above data contains the model-selected data from data reflected on both instruction and response and data reflected on response.
The complete data reflected on instruction, response or both can be found here:
Overall Reflected Data: Alpaca, WizardLM70k, WizardLM V2
The complete data statistics on (loss, and perplexity) on llama2-7b and llama2-13b model can be found here, which can be directly used for computing IFD scores:
Overall Reflected Data IFD scores:Alpaca llama2 7b, Alpaca llama2 13b, WizardLM70k llama2 7b, WizardLM70k llama2 13b
| AlpacaEval | Avg | ARC | HellaSwag | MMLU | TruthfulQA | Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpaca 7B | 26.46 | 50.21 | 42.65 | 76.91 | 41.73 | 39.55 | / | ||
| Recycled Alpaca 7B V2.0 | 79.58 | 56.05 | 54.01 | 78.07 | 46.69 | 45.41 | [hf-Link] | ||
| WizardLM 7B | 67.64 | 54.18 | 51.60 | 77.70 | 42.70 | 44.70 | / | ||
| Recycled WizardLM 7B V2.0 | 83.48 | 56.79 | 54.78 | 77.86 | 45.63 | 48.91 | [hf-Link] | ||
We use the prompt from FastChat:
A chat between a curious user and an artificial intelligence assistant. The assistant gives helpful, detailed, and polite answers to the user's questions. USER: Hi ASSISTANT: Hello.</s>USER: Who are you? ASSISTANT: I am ...</s>......
| Hyperparameter | Global Batch Size | Learning rate | Epochs | Max length | Weight decay | Warmup Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recycled Models (7B) | 128 | 2e-5 | 3 | 2048 | 0 | 0.03 |
| Recycled Models (13B) | 128 | 2e-5 | 3 | 2048 | 0 | 0.03 |
- [x] Release the code, data, and models for V1.
- [x] Release the method for Selective Reflection-Tuning (V2).
- [x] Release the data for Selective Reflection-Tuning (V2).
- [x] Release the models for Selective Reflection-Tuning (V2).
Please consider citing our paper if you think our codes, data, or models are useful. Thank you!
@inproceedings{li2023reflectiontuning,
title={Reflection-Tuning: Recycling Data for Better Instruction-Tuning},
author={Ming Li and Lichang Chen and Jiuhai Chen and Shwai He and Tianyi Zhou},
booktitle={NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Instruction Tuning and Instruction Following},
year={2023},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=xaqoZZqkPU}
}
@inproceedings{li-etal-2024-selective,
title = "Selective Reflection-Tuning: Student-Selected Data Recycling for {LLM} Instruction-Tuning",
author = "Li, Ming and
Chen, Lichang and
Chen, Jiuhai and
He, Shwai and
Gu, Jiuxiang and
Zhou, Tianyi",
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
Martins, Andre and
Srikumar, Vivek",
booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.958",
pages = "16189--16211",
}
@inproceedings{li-etal-2024-quantity,
title = "From Quantity to Quality: Boosting {LLM} Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning",
author = "Li, Ming and
Zhang, Yong and
Li, Zhitao and
Chen, Jiuhai and
Chen, Lichang and
Cheng, Ning and
Wang, Jianzong and
Zhou, Tianyi and
Xiao, Jing",
editor = "Duh, Kevin and
Gomez, Helena and
Bethard, Steven",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = jun,
year = "2024",
address = "Mexico City, Mexico",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.naacl-long.421",
pages = "7595--7628",
}
@inproceedings{li-etal-2024-superfiltering,
title = "Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuning",
author = "Li, Ming and
Zhang, Yong and
He, Shwai and
Li, Zhitao and
Zhao, Hongyu and
Wang, Jianzong and
Cheng, Ning and
Zhou, Tianyi",
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
Martins, Andre and
Srikumar, Vivek",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.769",
pages = "14255--14273",
}
If you are interested in Data Selection for Instruction Tuning, please see Cherry_LLM and Superfiltering.
If you are interested in human/LLM-free Data Augmentation for Instruction Tuning, please see Mosaic-IT and RuleR.
If you are interested in Data Improvement for Instruction Tuning, please see Reflection_Tuning.
If you are interested in Knowledge Distillation in the LLM era, please see this Survey.
For Tasks:
Click tags to check more tools for each tasksFor Jobs:
Alternative AI tools for Reflection_Tuning
Similar Open Source Tools
Reflection_Tuning
Reflection-Tuning is a project focused on improving the quality of instruction-tuning data through a reflection-based method. It introduces Selective Reflection-Tuning, where the student model can decide whether to accept the improvements made by the teacher model. The project aims to generate high-quality instruction-response pairs by defining specific criteria for the oracle model to follow and respond to. It also evaluates the efficacy and relevance of instruction-response pairs using the r-IFD metric. The project provides code for reflection and selection processes, along with data and model weights for both V1 and V2 methods.
k2
K2 (GeoLLaMA) is a large language model for geoscience, trained on geoscience literature and fine-tuned with knowledge-intensive instruction data. It outperforms baseline models on objective and subjective tasks. The repository provides K2 weights, core data of GeoSignal, GeoBench benchmark, and code for further pretraining and instruction tuning. The model is available on Hugging Face for use. The project aims to create larger and more powerful geoscience language models in the future.
MathCoder
MathCoder is a repository focused on enhancing mathematical reasoning by fine-tuning open-source language models to use code for modeling and deriving math equations. It introduces MathCodeInstruct dataset with solutions interleaving natural language, code, and execution results. The repository provides MathCoder models capable of generating code-based solutions for challenging math problems, achieving state-of-the-art scores on MATH and GSM8K datasets. It offers tools for model deployment, inference, and evaluation, along with a citation for referencing the work.
repromodel
ReproModel is an open-source toolbox designed to boost AI research efficiency by enabling researchers to reproduce, compare, train, and test AI models faster. It provides standardized models, dataloaders, and processing procedures, allowing researchers to focus on new datasets and model development. With a no-code solution, users can access benchmark and SOTA models and datasets, utilize training visualizations, extract code for publication, and leverage an LLM-powered automated methodology description writer. The toolbox helps researchers modularize development, compare pipeline performance reproducibly, and reduce time for model development, computation, and writing. Future versions aim to facilitate building upon state-of-the-art research by loading previously published study IDs with verified code, experiments, and results stored in the system.
ludwig
Ludwig is a declarative deep learning framework designed for scale and efficiency. It is a low-code framework that allows users to build custom AI models like LLMs and other deep neural networks with ease. Ludwig offers features such as optimized scale and efficiency, expert level control, modularity, and extensibility. It is engineered for production with prebuilt Docker containers, support for running with Ray on Kubernetes, and the ability to export models to Torchscript and Triton. Ludwig is hosted by the Linux Foundation AI & Data.
langkit
LangKit is an open-source text metrics toolkit for monitoring language models. It offers methods for extracting signals from input/output text, compatible with whylogs. Features include text quality, relevance, security, sentiment, toxicity analysis. Installation via PyPI. Modules contain UDFs for whylogs. Benchmarks show throughput on AWS instances. FAQs available.
XLearning
XLearning is a scheduling platform for big data and artificial intelligence, supporting various machine learning and deep learning frameworks. It runs on Hadoop Yarn and integrates frameworks like TensorFlow, MXNet, Caffe, Theano, PyTorch, Keras, XGBoost. XLearning offers scalability, compatibility, multiple deep learning framework support, unified data management based on HDFS, visualization display, and compatibility with code at native frameworks. It provides functions for data input/output strategies, container management, TensorBoard service, and resource usage metrics display. XLearning requires JDK >= 1.7 and Maven >= 3.3 for compilation, and deployment on CentOS 7.2 with Java >= 1.7 and Hadoop 2.6, 2.7, 2.8.
VideoLingo
VideoLingo is an all-in-one video translation and localization dubbing tool designed to generate Netflix-level high-quality subtitles. It aims to eliminate stiff machine translation, multiple lines of subtitles, and can even add high-quality dubbing, allowing knowledge from around the world to be shared across language barriers. Through an intuitive Streamlit web interface, the entire process from video link to embedded high-quality bilingual subtitles and even dubbing can be completed with just two clicks, easily creating Netflix-quality localized videos. Key features and functions include using yt-dlp to download videos from Youtube links, using WhisperX for word-level timeline subtitle recognition, using NLP and GPT for subtitle segmentation based on sentence meaning, summarizing intelligent term knowledge base with GPT for context-aware translation, three-step direct translation, reflection, and free translation to eliminate strange machine translation, checking single-line subtitle length and translation quality according to Netflix standards, using GPT-SoVITS for high-quality aligned dubbing, and integrating package for one-click startup and one-click output in streamlit.
katib
Katib is a Kubernetes-native project for automated machine learning (AutoML). Katib supports Hyperparameter Tuning, Early Stopping and Neural Architecture Search. Katib is the project which is agnostic to machine learning (ML) frameworks. It can tune hyperparameters of applications written in any language of the users’ choice and natively supports many ML frameworks, such as TensorFlow, Apache MXNet, PyTorch, XGBoost, and others. Katib can perform training jobs using any Kubernetes Custom Resources with out of the box support for Kubeflow Training Operator, Argo Workflows, Tekton Pipelines and many more.
tinyllm
tinyllm is a lightweight framework designed for developing, debugging, and monitoring LLM and Agent powered applications at scale. It aims to simplify code while enabling users to create complex agents or LLM workflows in production. The core classes, Function and FunctionStream, standardize and control LLM, ToolStore, and relevant calls for scalable production use. It offers structured handling of function execution, including input/output validation, error handling, evaluation, and more, all while maintaining code readability. Users can create chains with prompts, LLM models, and evaluators in a single file without the need for extensive class definitions or spaghetti code. Additionally, tinyllm integrates with various libraries like Langfuse and provides tools for prompt engineering, observability, logging, and finite state machine design.
carla
CARLA is an open-source simulator for autonomous driving research. It provides open-source code, protocols, and digital assets (urban layouts, buildings, vehicles) for developing, training, and validating autonomous driving systems. CARLA supports flexible specification of sensor suites and environmental conditions.
LLM-Zero-to-Hundred
LLM-Zero-to-Hundred is a repository showcasing various applications of LLM chatbots and providing insights into training and fine-tuning Language Models. It includes projects like WebGPT, RAG-GPT, WebRAGQuery, LLM Full Finetuning, RAG-Master LLamaindex vs Langchain, open-source-RAG-GEMMA, and HUMAIN: Advanced Multimodal, Multitask Chatbot. The projects cover features like ChatGPT-like interaction, RAG capabilities, image generation and understanding, DuckDuckGo integration, summarization, text and voice interaction, and memory access. Tutorials include LLM Function Calling and Visualizing Text Vectorization. The projects have a general structure with folders for README, HELPER, .env, configs, data, src, images, and utils.
vertex-ai-mlops
Vertex AI is a platform for end-to-end model development. It consist of core components that make the processes of MLOps possible for design patterns of all types.
fluid
Fluid is an open source Kubernetes-native Distributed Dataset Orchestrator and Accelerator for data-intensive applications, such as big data and AI applications. It implements dataset abstraction, scalable cache runtime, automated data operations, elasticity and scheduling, and is runtime platform agnostic. Key concepts include Dataset and Runtime. Prerequisites include Kubernetes version > 1.16, Golang 1.18+, and Helm 3. The tool offers features like accelerating remote file accessing, machine learning, accelerating PVC, preloading dataset, and on-the-fly dataset cache scaling. Contributions are welcomed, and the project is under the Apache 2.0 license with a vendor-neutral approach.
LLMs-from-scratch
This repository contains the code for coding, pretraining, and finetuning a GPT-like LLM and is the official code repository for the book Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch). In _Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch)_, you'll discover how LLMs work from the inside out. In this book, I'll guide you step by step through creating your own LLM, explaining each stage with clear text, diagrams, and examples. The method described in this book for training and developing your own small-but-functional model for educational purposes mirrors the approach used in creating large-scale foundational models such as those behind ChatGPT.
AGI-Papers
This repository contains a collection of papers and resources related to Large Language Models (LLMs), including their applications in various domains such as text generation, translation, question answering, and dialogue systems. The repository also includes discussions on the ethical and societal implications of LLMs. **Description** This repository is a collection of papers and resources related to Large Language Models (LLMs). LLMs are a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that can understand and generate human-like text. They have a wide range of applications, including text generation, translation, question answering, and dialogue systems. **For Jobs** - **Content Writer** - **Copywriter** - **Editor** - **Journalist** - **Marketer** **AI Keywords** - **Large Language Models** - **Natural Language Processing** - **Machine Learning** - **Artificial Intelligence** - **Deep Learning** **For Tasks** - **Generate text** - **Translate text** - **Answer questions** - **Engage in dialogue** - **Summarize text**
For similar tasks
Reflection_Tuning
Reflection-Tuning is a project focused on improving the quality of instruction-tuning data through a reflection-based method. It introduces Selective Reflection-Tuning, where the student model can decide whether to accept the improvements made by the teacher model. The project aims to generate high-quality instruction-response pairs by defining specific criteria for the oracle model to follow and respond to. It also evaluates the efficacy and relevance of instruction-response pairs using the r-IFD metric. The project provides code for reflection and selection processes, along with data and model weights for both V1 and V2 methods.
prometheus-eval
Prometheus-Eval is a repository dedicated to evaluating large language models (LLMs) in generation tasks. It provides state-of-the-art language models like Prometheus 2 (7B & 8x7B) for assessing in pairwise ranking formats and achieving high correlation scores with benchmarks. The repository includes tools for training, evaluating, and using these models, along with scripts for fine-tuning on custom datasets. Prometheus aims to address issues like fairness, controllability, and affordability in evaluations by simulating human judgments and proprietary LM-based assessments.
LLMs
LLMs is a Chinese large language model technology stack for practical use. It includes high-availability pre-training, SFT, and DPO preference alignment code framework. The repository covers pre-training data cleaning, high-concurrency framework, SFT dataset cleaning, data quality improvement, and security alignment work for Chinese large language models. It also provides open-source SFT dataset construction, pre-training from scratch, and various tools and frameworks for data cleaning, quality optimization, and task alignment.
ProX
ProX is a lm-based data refinement framework that automates the process of cleaning and improving data used in pre-training large language models. It offers better performance, domain flexibility, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods. The framework has been shown to improve model performance by over 2% and boost accuracy by up to 20% in tasks like math. ProX is designed to refine data at scale without the need for manual adjustments, making it a valuable tool for data preprocessing in natural language processing tasks.
For similar jobs
LLM-Agent-Survey
Autonomous agents are designed to achieve specific objectives through self-guided instructions. With the emergence and growth of large language models (LLMs), there is a growing trend in utilizing LLMs as fundamental controllers for these autonomous agents. This repository conducts a comprehensive survey study on the construction, application, and evaluation of LLM-based autonomous agents. It explores essential components of AI agents, application domains in natural sciences, social sciences, and engineering, and evaluation strategies. The survey aims to be a resource for researchers and practitioners in this rapidly evolving field.
AIProductHome
AI Product Home is a repository dedicated to collecting various AI commercial or open-source products. It provides assistance in submitting issues, self-recommendation, correcting resources, and more. The repository also features AI tools like Build Naidia, Autopod, Rytr, Mubert, and a virtual town driven by AI. It includes sections for AI models, chat dialogues, AI assistants, code assistance, artistic creation, content creation, and more. The repository covers a wide range of AI-related tools and resources for users interested in AI products and services.
AI-Catalog
AI-Catalog is a curated list of AI tools, platforms, and resources across various domains. It serves as a comprehensive repository for users to discover and explore a wide range of AI applications. The catalog includes tools for tasks such as text-to-image generation, summarization, prompt generation, writing assistance, code assistance, developer tools, low code/no code tools, audio editing, video generation, 3D modeling, search engines, chatbots, email assistants, fun tools, gaming, music generation, presentation tools, website builders, education assistants, autonomous AI agents, photo editing, AI extensions, deep face/deep fake detection, text-to-speech, startup tools, SQL-related AI tools, education tools, and text-to-video conversion.
awesome-ai-repositories
A curated list of open source repositories for AI Engineers. The repository provides a comprehensive collection of tools and frameworks for various AI-related tasks such as AI Gateway, AI Workload Manager, Copilot Development, Dataset Engineering, Evaluation, Fine Tuning, Function Calling, Graph RAG, Guardrails, Local Model Inference, LLM Agent Framework, Model Serving, Observability, Pre Training, Prompt Engineering, RAG Framework, Security, Structured Extraction, Structured Generation, Vector DB, and Voice Agent.
AI-Bootcamp
The AI Bootcamp is a comprehensive training program focusing on real-world applications to equip individuals with the skills and knowledge needed to excel as AI engineers. The bootcamp covers topics such as Real-World PyTorch, Machine Learning Projects, Fine-tuning Tiny LLM, Deployment of LLM to Production, AI Agents with GPT-4 Turbo, CrewAI, Llama 3, and more. Participants will learn foundational skills in Python for AI, ML Pipelines, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Agents, and work on projects like RagBase for private document chat.
easyAi
EasyAi is a lightweight, beginner-friendly Java artificial intelligence algorithm framework. It can be seamlessly integrated into Java projects with Maven, requiring no additional environment configuration or dependencies. The framework provides pre-packaged modules for image object detection and AI customer service, as well as various low-level algorithm tools for deep learning, machine learning, reinforcement learning, heuristic learning, and matrix operations. Developers can easily develop custom micro-models tailored to their business needs.
awesome-ai-newsletters
Awesome AI Newsletters is a curated list of AI-related newsletters that provide the latest news, trends, tools, and insights in the field of Artificial Intelligence. It includes a variety of newsletters covering general AI news, prompts for marketing and productivity, AI job opportunities, and newsletters tailored for professionals in the AI industry. Whether you are a beginner looking to stay updated on AI advancements or a professional seeking to enhance your knowledge and skills, this repository offers a collection of valuable resources to help you navigate the world of AI.
Reflection_Tuning
Reflection-Tuning is a project focused on improving the quality of instruction-tuning data through a reflection-based method. It introduces Selective Reflection-Tuning, where the student model can decide whether to accept the improvements made by the teacher model. The project aims to generate high-quality instruction-response pairs by defining specific criteria for the oracle model to follow and respond to. It also evaluates the efficacy and relevance of instruction-response pairs using the r-IFD metric. The project provides code for reflection and selection processes, along with data and model weights for both V1 and V2 methods.